- Felicia, 53, is quitting her job because she was required to work five days a week in person.
- She maintained a flawless work-life balance for more than a year, spending three days at home and two at the office.
- But rather than continue working for five days, she would prefer to find a job that pays less.
Felicia was skeptical that her friend actually desired to go back to work.
After being contacted five days a week, she is quitting her position entirely. She would rather avoid working every day at the office than accept a six-figure wage.
“I’m competent at doing my work. I don’t have to be at an office to work,” she said, according to Insider.”I was determined not to go back to the way it had felt before.”
Felicia, a manager in Arizona, is 53 years old. She requested for her last name, place of job, and pay to be concealed in order to safeguard her privacy, and Insider confirmed them.
The age of entirely remote employment may be coming to an end as businesses make cuts. According to current data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which shows a significant increase from 60% in 2021, about 73% of businesses provided little to no telework in September. Major businesses, even those that have laid off, need to bring in those employees. He gave some employees the option to stay on the job and dismiss some employees.
Felicia, though, is starting to lose it.
During his time, a hybrid schedule was prepared for one and a half years, in which three days of continuous work was done at home and two days continuously worked on duty. This, in his words, was a perfect task.
Talking about her old days while staying at home, she said, “I noticed that when I was working on hybrid days I worked much more than my capacity. She continued by saying that due to all the “interferences and hurdles” while working, I could never complete my work on time. “She explained that she often encountered the difficulty of having to work for prolonged hours upon returning home, striving to complete her tasks,” she shared.
However, Felicia submitted her notice of resignation after just about a month of having to do all of her duties in person. When working electronically, she loved being able to concentrate quietly before switching to working in-person on days when the office was open. She feels as if she is seeing less of her colleagues now that watercooler rumors are back in full force.
One day, being stuck in traffic, he decided that he should leave now. Oh my gosh, she remarked, “just sitting there and thinking. I have a meeting coming up yet I’m stuck in this.” And I wonder, “Why am I subjecting myself to this when it’s not even necessary?”
Managers seek proof that staff are working hard while they cut costs.
Despite having worked remotely for years, some supervisors continue to have excessive concerns about their remote workers’ productivity, a condition known as “productivity paranoia.”
Felicia said that supervisors at her workplace believed hybrid staff weren’t effective. “Oh, you guys were only working two days per week and off for three,” she recalled hearing often. “No, that’s not true, it says, and. When we were working the three at home, we completed the most of our work.
She said that many other employees she knows at her place of business had left for more remote or hybrid positions, and that their seeming independence prompted her to leave since it made her lose the balance she had.
“I’ve realized that the present time wasn’t good for me,” she remarked.
Felicia said that she is seeking positions that will provide her the same flexibility, even if they pay less than her current salary.
When compared to being able to do the same amount of work and more thanks to the convenience of the hybrid option, she added, being on the road five days a week is less stressful.
More rigid return-to-office requirements, according to Felicia, might hurt productivity and cause a mass exodus of employees, particularly those who are happy with their positions but don’t want to work in an office.
He warned that in the end you will lose this job.